Skip to main content


The defence in the cheque bounce cases will always have to prove that the cheque bounced was not in lieu for discharging any debt or liability to the aggrieved party. The supporting evidence can be countering the materials or facts brought in by the appellant. In some situations countering the evidence is enough to raise probable defence and if the Court has an iota of doubt that it was not for discharging any liability, the proceedings becomes hard to be maintained in the Courts of law as it tilts towards favoring the defending party.